FactoWiki

Evidence review

Lutein and zeaxanthin for eye health: evidence reviewed

The key evidence comes from AREDS2, a National Eye Institute trial of 4,203 people at risk of advanced age-related macular degeneration. Adding lutein 10 mg and zeaxanthin 2 mg to the existing AREDS formula did not significantly reduce progression in the primary analysis, though secondary analyses suggested benefit, especially for people with low dietary intake and when lutein replaced beta-carotene. The trial did not show a reduction in cataract surgery or benefit for people with healthy eyes.

Ingredient evidence ≠ product proof

This page reviews research on an ingredient. It does not show that any branded supplement containing that ingredient works, because commercial products may use a different form, dose or combination, and are rarely tested themselves. This is an evidence page: it contains no affiliate links.

The research question

Do lutein and zeaxanthin supplements slow progression of age-related macular degeneration, or reduce cataract, in older adults?

Evidence table: population → dose → duration → result → limitations

StudyPopulationDose / interventionDurationResultLimitations
AREDS2, JAMA 20134,203 adults aged 50–85 at risk of advanced AMDAREDS formula ± lutein 10 mg/zeaxanthin 2 mg, ± omega-3; beta-carotene and zinc variationsMedian about 5 yearsNo significant additional reduction in progression to advanced AMD (primary analysis)Tested on top of an already effective formula
AREDS2 report 3, 2014Same cohortSecondary analysesAs aboveBenefit suggested in lowest dietary-intake group; lutein/zeaxanthin better than beta-carotene in direct comparisonSecondary analyses; hypothesis-generating
AREDS2 report 4, 2013Participants with natural lensesLutein 10 mg/zeaxanthin 2 mg vs noneAs aboveNo overall reduction in progression to cataract surgeryPopulation at risk of AMD

What the results show

AREDS2 was large, long and publicly funded, which makes it the most important evidence here. Its primary result for adding lutein and zeaxanthin was not statistically significant. The recommended formula still changed: lutein and zeaxanthin replaced beta-carotene, which had been linked to lung cancer risk in smokers and former smokers. The National Eye Institute AREDS/AREDS2 FAQ also notes that lowering zinc did not significantly change the formula’s effectiveness.

What the research does not prove

Safety

Limitations of the evidence base

Frequently asked questions

What dose was used in AREDS2?

Lutein 10 mg and zeaxanthin 2 mg daily, added to vitamins C and E, zinc and copper.

Did AREDS2 show lutein works?

The primary analysis was not significant; secondary analyses suggested benefit in some groups.

Should people with healthy eyes take lutein?

AREDS2 studied people at risk of advanced AMD; it does not establish benefit for healthy eyes.

Related on FactoWiki

Lutein ingredient guide · How much lutein and zeaxanthin · Vision & eye category

References

  1. AREDS2 Research Group. Lutein + zeaxanthin and omega-3 fatty acids for AMD: the AREDS2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;309(19):2005–2015. PMID 23644932
  2. AREDS2 Research Group. Secondary analyses of the effects of lutein/zeaxanthin on AMD progression: AREDS2 report no. 3. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(2):142–149. PMID 24310343
  3. AREDS2 Research Group. Lutein/zeaxanthin for the treatment of age-related cataract: AREDS2 report no. 4. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(7):843–850. PMID 23645227
  4. National Eye Institute AREDS/AREDS2 FAQ.
  5. NIH ODS: Zinc fact sheet for health professionals. Link